mike
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by mike on Jan 19, 2014 18:20:38 GMT
Hi. I'm a regular visitor to enenews and saw utahruss's posts there recently, followed the link, and found my way here.
I'm a mechanical engineer and a systems engineer and I understand just enough nuclear chemistry to be able to think outside the box. A lot of it is from independent study mostly over the past three years. Studied both Fukushima and also Chernobyl. There are interesting parallels.
At any rate, I should be able to contribute to the discussion here.
This forum is needed, along with enenews.
|
|
|
Post by Ex_Nuke_Troop on Jan 19, 2014 18:36:48 GMT
First off WELCOME MIKE and please continue the dialogue, we are STARVING for it Enenews is indeed a valuable resource, I generally take it a step or 6 BEYOND them and use Enenews like a trail of breadcrumbs, theirs is a fantastic offering of crumbs laid on the ground, some of the crumbs are rotten, others take you down blind allies others prove worthy of further exploration, but as A raw source they are pretty solid, as long as you VERIFY their offerings employing critical reasoning.
|
|
mike
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by mike on Jan 20, 2014 2:34:57 GMT
Yes, as a news aggregator, enenews' main function is to be a historical record of what has happened, verifiably, since the beginning of the Fukushima catastrophe. The comments digest and discuss the news, adding credibility to the enenews historical record.
Enenews serves as an excellent public record that cannot be expunged.
I hope that this forum can find a different, symbiotic purpose.
|
|
|
Post by Ex_Nuke_Troop on Jan 20, 2014 2:58:30 GMT
I'd say ours is a symbiotic purpose. What we are about is finding the truth whatever that proves to be, and working toward a common solution through collective effort, knowledge and experience.
The Forum itself is still very new and it's character is expected to evolve over time, as will it's reputation as a reliable alternative source for information sharing.
|
|