|
|
Post by Ex_Nuke_Troop on Jan 13, 2014 0:51:42 GMT
This Forum, presents in many cases very RAW data and discussion, not all of which is properly sourced or vetted, nor is that the intention. The vetting is ongoing, and the more it is discussed and picked apart the better the information will become. As a Forum it is expected that people will post conflicting, poor data and that the discussion will 'clean it up'.
We are hoping that the Forum will grow in influence and attract experts in various fields, if there IS some kind of international conspiracy involved it will be exposed over time, if NOT that too will be exposed. But we do NOT inherently trust our government(s) industry(s) international body(s) or the scientific community(s) are giving us all/accurate information. The history is replete with examples FOR this skepticism.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ex_Nuke_Troop on Jan 20, 2014 2:22:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Ex_Nuke_Troop on Jan 23, 2014 13:50:33 GMT
In the pursuit of truth, one must be ready at any time to defend what truth(s) one holds dear, but also ready that IF/When those truth(s) are proved wrong, faulty, prejudiced or false WILLING to abandon or amend them. As we deal in MOUNTAINS of datum and data points from numerous sources, this is expected to be an ongoing one. At a minimum, if datum or data points are questionable for any reason supplemental annotations are expected, stating what calls that data into question, AND how these questions effect conclusions drawn FROM questionable datum, data points. IF a source is considered 'compromised' but links to otherwise sound datum, data points from outside/independent sources, eliminate the 'compromised' source ... an example, if say you find that Alex Jones links to sound data, ELIMINATE Alex Jones. Just quote the linked data ... no need for Alex Jones.
By the very nature of the truth we are trying to bring to the world, we have a great responsibility for integrity, especially since that work we've chosen calls the integrity of others into question. People who live in glass houses ...
I've already had occasion to PURGE proven faulty datum, data points and sources from this site. I apologized to outside persons who questioned my integrity, and my reliance upon faulty data sources, to the extent that an article I linked too, while containing links to valuable data, is published on a site which is rabidly antisemitic and forwards absolute hogwash claiming Mossad, Bush executed 9/11. This Forum will NO LONGER accept ANY datum, data points or materials published by Veterans Today in ANY form whatsoever. I do not care that other(s) possibly in our midst rely heavily on Veterans Today and Bob Nichols in particular as a source, that material is WORTHLESS here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ex_Nuke_Troop on Jan 27, 2014 1:08:45 GMT
Round 1 (of many)of vetting sources is now completeYou will notice warnings or statements on suspicious sites, articles and sources where it has been determined the data may NOT be of expected value or reliability. Please also note the new section The Wall of Shame where the worst offenders reside, ultimately Fairewinds may come completely off this site, I haven't determined whether ANY of their content is of use to us, maybe others can opine and help me with this determination ? fukushimatruths.freeforums.net/board/95/wall-shame
|
|
so whats happening in the Solomons, is haarp missing its mark?