Post by Ex_Nuke_Troop on Jan 13, 2014 7:29:00 GMT
Sneak Peek at what's coming !
Questions regarding on-going radioactive contamination from Fukushima:
For purposes of discussion, I've said elsewhere (in another thread) that I'm willing to partially concede the dilution argument. I believe both of our statements are inaccurate as they are simplistic and do not address the following considerations. This is NOT meant to be definitive, it is intended instead to foster discussion between whomever would like to discuss point by point what is truly happening, it's long term implications and inspire investigation. I will also for the purpose of civility acknowledge my bias(s) and a brief statement of what I'm attempting to do/address.
Operating from an admitted bias is difficult enough, but at the same time I'm also trying to address and help quash fear-mongering posts, sensationalism, inaccurate sourcing or the lack thereof. I'm after the unvarnished truth, whatever that may be. I trust that when taken as a whole, and then broken down into individual or collective items, my concerns are relevant, timely and responsible. The links will go directly to my Forum to familiarize people with the large body of data therein, but each reference internal to the Forum are direct links to the source.
I have very little faith that we are being told or provided ALL the data we need to be properly informed, that blanket statements from government(s) industry(s) and other entities are NOT sufficient. I operate FROM these qualifiers, and will continue to do so until it is proven otherwise to me.
Flawed basic assumptions and difficulties:
*The assumption of reliable data on release(s) water/atmospheric from industries, governments, the IAEA and independent sources
*The assumption of static systems(s) water/atmospheric
*The assumption of static discharge(s) water/atmospheric
*The assumption of static contamination(s) water/atmospheric/biological
*The failure to consider nuclear waste dumping by multiple nations
*The failure to consider nuclear weapons testing by multiple nations water/atmospheric
*The availability of data which specifically identifies Fukushima as the source in question. Radioactive signatures specific to forensic sciences.
*The assumption that TEPCO is responsibly handling the situation, reporting data and situation accurately, that this data is being responsibly and accurately verified by government(s) the IAEA and other international authorities and by industry and independent sources
*The assumption that TEPCO is financially prepared to handle this situation for decades
*The assumption that no similar earthquake/tsunami event will further this disaster or create similar problems elsewhere in Japan or other seismically unstable regions
*The assumption that the spent fuel cores/rods/assemblies from the Fukushima reactors are under control, no longer hazardous and proper methods of containment/sequestration are in place and working
The Body:
The assumption of reliable data on release(s) water/atmospheric from industries, governments, the IAEA and independent sources
It seems to be assumed that there is reliable, irrefutable data from US/Japanese and other governments, from TEPCO, from the IAEA and other bodies pertaining to both the initial and on-going atmospheric and water (oceanic and groundwater) releases of radioactive materials. While there are assets available to the public for that purpose, there are also numerous problems.
TEPCO coverups
TEPCO withheld Fukushima radioactive water measurements for 6 months
fukushimatruths.freeforums.net/thread/319/
Japanese Govt coverups
BBC : Fukushima leak is 'much worse than we were led to believe'
fukushimatruths.freeforums.net/thread/322/bbc-fukushima-leak-worse
Tokyo governor contradicts PM's claim that Fukushima is 'under control'
fukushimatruths.freeforums.net/thread/327/japan-today
IAEA – Japanese coverup bottom article
fukushimatruths.freeforums.net/thread/277/ministry-foreign-affairs-japan?page=1&scrollTo=391
Fukuleaks.org : Fukushima Govt. & Fukushima Medical University Signed Secrecy Pact With IAEA
fukushimatruths.freeforums.net/thread/129/fukuleaks-fukushima-govt-medical-universi
Japanese lawmaker breaks taboo
fukushimatruths.freeforums.net/thread/177/
Questions regarding on-going radioactive contamination from Fukushima:
For purposes of discussion, I've said elsewhere (in another thread) that I'm willing to partially concede the dilution argument. I believe both of our statements are inaccurate as they are simplistic and do not address the following considerations. This is NOT meant to be definitive, it is intended instead to foster discussion between whomever would like to discuss point by point what is truly happening, it's long term implications and inspire investigation. I will also for the purpose of civility acknowledge my bias(s) and a brief statement of what I'm attempting to do/address.
Operating from an admitted bias is difficult enough, but at the same time I'm also trying to address and help quash fear-mongering posts, sensationalism, inaccurate sourcing or the lack thereof. I'm after the unvarnished truth, whatever that may be. I trust that when taken as a whole, and then broken down into individual or collective items, my concerns are relevant, timely and responsible. The links will go directly to my Forum to familiarize people with the large body of data therein, but each reference internal to the Forum are direct links to the source.
I have very little faith that we are being told or provided ALL the data we need to be properly informed, that blanket statements from government(s) industry(s) and other entities are NOT sufficient. I operate FROM these qualifiers, and will continue to do so until it is proven otherwise to me.
Flawed basic assumptions and difficulties:
*The assumption of reliable data on release(s) water/atmospheric from industries, governments, the IAEA and independent sources
*The assumption of static systems(s) water/atmospheric
*The assumption of static discharge(s) water/atmospheric
*The assumption of static contamination(s) water/atmospheric/biological
*The failure to consider nuclear waste dumping by multiple nations
*The failure to consider nuclear weapons testing by multiple nations water/atmospheric
*The availability of data which specifically identifies Fukushima as the source in question. Radioactive signatures specific to forensic sciences.
*The assumption that TEPCO is responsibly handling the situation, reporting data and situation accurately, that this data is being responsibly and accurately verified by government(s) the IAEA and other international authorities and by industry and independent sources
*The assumption that TEPCO is financially prepared to handle this situation for decades
*The assumption that no similar earthquake/tsunami event will further this disaster or create similar problems elsewhere in Japan or other seismically unstable regions
*The assumption that the spent fuel cores/rods/assemblies from the Fukushima reactors are under control, no longer hazardous and proper methods of containment/sequestration are in place and working
The Body:
The assumption of reliable data on release(s) water/atmospheric from industries, governments, the IAEA and independent sources
It seems to be assumed that there is reliable, irrefutable data from US/Japanese and other governments, from TEPCO, from the IAEA and other bodies pertaining to both the initial and on-going atmospheric and water (oceanic and groundwater) releases of radioactive materials. While there are assets available to the public for that purpose, there are also numerous problems.
TEPCO coverups
TEPCO withheld Fukushima radioactive water measurements for 6 months
fukushimatruths.freeforums.net/thread/319/
Japanese Govt coverups
BBC : Fukushima leak is 'much worse than we were led to believe'
fukushimatruths.freeforums.net/thread/322/bbc-fukushima-leak-worse
Tokyo governor contradicts PM's claim that Fukushima is 'under control'
fukushimatruths.freeforums.net/thread/327/japan-today
IAEA – Japanese coverup bottom article
fukushimatruths.freeforums.net/thread/277/ministry-foreign-affairs-japan?page=1&scrollTo=391
Fukuleaks.org : Fukushima Govt. & Fukushima Medical University Signed Secrecy Pact With IAEA
fukushimatruths.freeforums.net/thread/129/fukuleaks-fukushima-govt-medical-universi
Japanese lawmaker breaks taboo
fukushimatruths.freeforums.net/thread/177/